UNISOC T700 vs Intel Celeron E1400

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


UNISOC T700 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron E1400
UNISOC T700 Intel Celeron E1400

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the UNISOC T700 and the Intel Celeron E1400 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the UNISOC T700 8 core processor released in Q1/2021 with the Intel Celeron E1400 which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2008.
UNISOC 4G (10) Family Intel Celeron (165)
UNISOC 4G 12nm (8) CPU group Intel Celeron E1000 (4)
0 Generation 1
-- Architecture Conroe (Core)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The UNISOC T700 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.80 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron E1400 clocks with 2.00 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.

UNISOC T700 Characteristic Intel Celeron E1400
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.80 GHz
2x Cortex-A75
A-Core 2.00 GHz
2x Core
1.80 GHz
6x Cortex-A55
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

UNISOC T700 Characteristic Intel Celeron E1400
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-G52 MP2 GPU no iGPU
0.85 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation --
16 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
2 Compute units --
32 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G52 MP2 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the UNISOC T700, while the Intel Celeron E1400 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s enabled.

UNISOC T700 Characteristic Intel Celeron E1400
LPDDR4X-1866, LPDDR4-1866, LPDDR3-933 Memory DDR3-1066, DDR2-800
Max. Memory 16 GB
0 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 17.1 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache 0.50 MB
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The UNISOC T700 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Celeron E1400 is 65 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

UNISOC T700 Characteristic Intel Celeron E1400
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 65 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The UNISOC T700 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 12 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron E1400 is at 0.50 MB. The processor is manufactured in 65 nm.

UNISOC T700 Characteristic Intel Celeron E1400
12 nm Technology 65 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
-- Socket LGA 775
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2021 Release date Q2/2008
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the UNISOC T700 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron E1400 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
UNISOC T700 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 (70%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
UNISOC T700 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 (28%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
350 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 Intel Celeron E1400
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
244 (70%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
1348 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 Intel Celeron E1400
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
384 (28%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
417 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 Intel Celeron E1400
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
1392 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 Intel Celeron E1400
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 @ 0.85 GHz
54 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 Intel Celeron E1400
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
165879 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 Intel Celeron E1400
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
188599 (100%)
Intel Celeron E1400 Intel Celeron E1400
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron E1400 Intel Celeron E1400
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz
586 (100%)

Devices using this processor

UNISOC T700 Intel Celeron E1400
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. UNISOC T700Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 UNISOC T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
2. UNISOC T700MediaTek Helio G37 UNISOC T700 vs MediaTek Helio G37
3. UNISOC T700MediaTek Helio G85 UNISOC T700 vs MediaTek Helio G85
4. UNISOC T700UNISOC T606 UNISOC T700 vs UNISOC T606
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GUNISOC T700 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs UNISOC T700
6. UNISOC T700Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 UNISOC T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7. UNISOC T700MediaTek Helio G80 UNISOC T700 vs MediaTek Helio G80
8. UNISOC T700MediaTek Helio P35 UNISOC T700 vs MediaTek Helio P35
9. UNISOC T700Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G UNISOC T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
10. AMD Ryzen 5 4500Intel Celeron E1400 AMD Ryzen 5 4500 vs Intel Celeron E1400


back to index