Samsung S5L8920 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung S5L8920 | Intel Xeon Silver 4209T | |
CPU comparisonSamsung S5L8920 or Intel Xeon Silver 4209T - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung S5L8920 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 0.60 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung S5L8920 was released in Q2/2009. The Intel Xeon Silver 4209T has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Silver 4209T was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| Samsung S5L (3) | Family | Intel Xeon Silver (32) |
| Samsung S5L8920 (1) | CPU group | Intel Xeon Silver 4200 (11) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Cortex-A8 | Architecture | Cascade Lake |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | Intel Xeon Silver 4109T |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung S5L8920 has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 1 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Samsung S5L8920 is 0.60 GHz while the Intel Xeon Silver 4209T has 8 CPU cores and 16 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Silver 4209T is at 2.20 GHz (3.20 GHz). |
||
| Samsung S5L8920 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Silver 4209T |
| 1 | Cores | 8 |
| 1 | Threads | 16 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 0.60 GHz | Frequency | 2.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.40 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe Samsung S5L8920 or Intel Xeon Silver 4209T has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| PowerVR SGX535 | GPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | -- | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| 65nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 2 | Compute units | -- |
| 2 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 10.1 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| PowerVR SGX535 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung S5L8920 can use up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Xeon Silver 4209T supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 115.2 GB/s. |
||
| Samsung S5L8920 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Silver 4209T |
| Memory | DDR4-2400 | |
| Max. Memory | 1024 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 0.26 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 11.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 48 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Samsung S5L8920 is --, while the Intel Xeon Silver 4209T has a TDP of 70 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Samsung S5L8920 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Silver 4209T |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 70 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung S5L8920 is manufactured in 65 nm and has 0.26 MB cache. The Intel Xeon Silver 4209T is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 11.00 MB cache. |
||
| Samsung S5L8920 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Silver 4209T |
| 65 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2009 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 501 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
1C 1T @ 0.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 16T @ 2.20 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung S5L8920
1C 1T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung S5L8920
1C 1T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
8C 16T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung S5L8920
1C 1T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
8C 16T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung S5L8920 | Intel Xeon Silver 4209T |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
