Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9825 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Samsung Exynos 9825 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 9825 and the Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Samsung Exynos 9825 8 core processor released in Q3/2019 with the Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 which has 18 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2016.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family Intel Xeon E5 (71)
Samsung Exynos 9825 (1) CPU group Intel Xeon E5 v4 (24)
3 Generation 6
Exynos M4/Cortex-A75/-A55 Architecture Broadwell E
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9825 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.73 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 clocks with 2.20 GHz (3.30 GHz), has 18 CPU cores and can calculate 36 threads in parallel.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
8 Cores 18
8 Threads 36
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.73 GHz
2x Exynos M4
A-Core 2.20 GHz (3.30 GHz)
2.31 GHz
2x Cortex-A75
B-Core --
1.95 GHz
4x Cortex-A55
C-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU no iGPU
0.70 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 3 GPU Generation --
7 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
12 Compute units --
192 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 12 GB of memory in a maximum of 4 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 9825, while the Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 supports a maximum of 1536 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s enabled.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
LPDDR4X-1866 Memory DDR4-2400
12 GB Max. Memory 1536 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s
No ECC Yes
1.50 MB L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 45.00 MB
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 40
-- PCIe Bandwidth 39.4 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 is 120 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 120 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has 3.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 is at 45.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
7 nm Technology 14 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
-- Socket LGA 2011-3
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2019 Release date Q1/2016
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9825 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9825 (78%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9825 (23%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
731 (80%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 3.30 GHz
910 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2098 (21%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 2.50 GHz
10224 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
806 (76%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 3.30 GHz
1061 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2069 (29%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 2.50 GHz
7248 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
3714 (19%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 2.50 GHz
19667 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
ARM Mali-G76 MP12 @ 0.70 GHz
607 (100%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
455970 (100%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 3.30 GHz
137 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
18C 36T @ 2.50 GHz
2384 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9825 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
2. Samsung Exynos 9825Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Samsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5. Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 990
6. Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
7. Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
9. Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 9825


back to index