Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Intel Celeron 3755U

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9825 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron 3755U
Samsung Exynos 9825 Intel Celeron 3755U

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 9825 and the Intel Celeron 3755U and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Samsung Exynos 9825 8 core processor released in Q3/2019 with the Intel Celeron 3755U which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2015.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family Intel Celeron (165)
Samsung Exynos 9825 (1) CPU group Intel Celeron 3000 (10)
3 Generation 7
Exynos M4/Cortex-A75/-A55 Architecture Kaby Lake U
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9825 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.73 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron 3755U clocks with 1.70 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3755U
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.73 GHz
2x Exynos M4
A-Core 1.70 GHz
2.31 GHz
2x Cortex-A75
B-Core --
1.95 GHz
4x Cortex-A55
C-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3755U
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1)
0.70 GHz GPU frequency 0.10 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.80 GHz
Bifrost 3 GPU Generation 8
7 nm Technology 14 nm
2 Max. displays 3
12 Compute units 12
192 Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
12 DirectX Version 11.2

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1)
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 12 GB of memory in a maximum of 4 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 9825, while the Intel Celeron 3755U supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s enabled.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3755U
LPDDR4X-1866 Memory LPDDR3-1600, DDR3L-1600
12 GB Max. Memory 16 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s
No ECC No
1.50 MB L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes 12
-- PCIe Bandwidth 6.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Celeron 3755U is 15 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3755U
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 15 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down 10 W
-- Tjunction max. 105 °C

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has 3.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron 3755U is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Intel Celeron 3755U
7 nm Technology 14 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-- Socket BGA 1168
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2019 Release date Q1/2015
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9825 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 3755U to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9825 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U (48%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9825 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U (34%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
731 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
394 (54%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2098 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
830 (40%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
806 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
335 (42%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2069 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
625 (30%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
ARM Mali-G76 MP12 @ 0.70 GHz
607 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) @ 0.80 GHz
154 (25%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
3714 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
1180 (32%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
455970 (100%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
69 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3755U
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz
133 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9825 Intel Celeron 3755U
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
2. Samsung Exynos 9825Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Samsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5. Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 990
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
8. Intel Celeron 3755UIntel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron 3755U vs Intel Celeron J1900
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
10. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 9825


back to index