Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Apple A17 Pro

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9825 CPU1 vs CPU2 Apple A17 Pro
Samsung Exynos 9825 Apple A17 Pro

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 9825 and the Apple A17 Pro and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Samsung Exynos 9825 8 core processor released in Q3/2019 with the Apple A17 Pro which has 6 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2023.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family Apple A series (22)
Samsung Exynos 9825 (1) CPU group Apple A17 (1)
3 Generation 17
Exynos M4/Cortex-A75/-A55 Architecture A17
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor Apple A16 Bionic
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9825 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.73 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Apple A17 Pro clocks with 3.78 GHz, has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 6 threads in parallel.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
8 Cores 6
8 Threads 6
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.73 GHz
2x Exynos M4
A-Core 3.78 GHz
2.31 GHz
2x Cortex-A75
B-Core 2.11 GHz
1.95 GHz
4x Cortex-A55
C-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
-- AI hardware Apple Neural Engine
-- AI specifications 16 Neural cores @ 35 TOPS
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores)
0.70 GHz GPU frequency 1.40 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 3 GPU Generation --
7 nm Technology 3 nm
2 Max. displays 3
12 Compute units 24
192 Shader 768
No Hardware Raytracing Yes
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory 6 GB
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores)
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 12 GB of memory in a maximum of 4 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 9825, while the Apple A17 Pro supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
LPDDR4X-1866 Memory LPDDR5-6400
12 GB Max. Memory 8 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC No
1.50 MB L2 Cache 20.00 MB
2.00 MB L3 Cache 24.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Apple A17 Pro is 11 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 11 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has 3.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Apple A17 Pro is at 44.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 3 nm.

Samsung Exynos 9825 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
7 nm Technology 3 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8.6-A (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems iOS
Q3/2019 Release date Q3/2023
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9825 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Apple A17 Pro to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.9 stars (114 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9825 (31%)
Apple A17 Pro (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9825 (32%)
Apple A17 Pro (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
731 (34%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
2140 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2098 (36%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
5868 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
806 (27%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
2952 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2069 (28%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
7462 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
ARM Mali-G76 MP12 @ 0.70 GHz
607 (28%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores) @ 1.40 GHz
2147 (100%)

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
1488440 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
1108570 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
455970 (100%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
3714 (100%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
0 (0%)

AI performance (NPU)

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
35 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9825 Apple A17 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Apple A17 ProApple M1 Apple A17 Pro vs Apple M1
2. Apple A17 ProApple M2 Apple A17 Pro vs Apple M2
3. Apple A17 ProApple A16 Bionic Apple A17 Pro vs Apple A16 Bionic
4. Apple A17 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 Apple A17 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for GalaxyApple A17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy vs Apple A17 Pro
6. Apple A17 ProApple M3 Apple A17 Pro vs Apple M3
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
8. Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)Apple A17 Pro Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU) vs Apple A17 Pro
9. Apple A14 BionicApple A17 Pro Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A17 Pro
10. Apple A17 ProGoogle Tensor G3 Apple A17 Pro vs Google Tensor G3


back to index