Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9610 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
Samsung Exynos 9610 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 9610 or Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 was released in Q4/2018.

The Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 was released in Q1/2016.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family Intel Xeon E5 (71)
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) CPU group Intel Xeon E5 v4 (24)
3 Generation 6
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Broadwell E
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9610 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. The Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz (3.20 GHz).

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
8 Cores 4
8 Threads 8
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
A-Core 2.60 GHz (3.20 GHz)
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU no iGPU
0.85 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation --
16 nm Technology
1 Max. displays
3 Compute units --
48 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Samsung Exynos 9610 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 can connect up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
LPDDR4X-1600 Memory DDR4-2133
Max. Memory 1536 GB
0 Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 68.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 10.00 MB
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 40
-- PCIe Bandwidth 39.4 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 is 85 W.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 85 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 cache has a total of 10.00 MB.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
10 nm Technology 14 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
-- Socket LGA 2011-3
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q4/2018 Release date Q1/2016
-- Release price 440 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9610 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9610 (37%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9610 (34%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
329 (37%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz
886 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1164 (36%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
4C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
3254 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
2235 (32%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
4C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
6928 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
370 (100%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1095 (100%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
4C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (100%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
171465 (100%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
4C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz
134 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
4C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
615 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9610 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2. Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
3. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5. Intel Core i7-6700KIntel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Core i7-6700K vs Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
6. Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
7. Samsung Exynos 1380Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GSamsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
9. Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4Intel Xeon Silver 4112 Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4112
10. Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4


back to index