Samsung Exynos 9610 vs AMD Athlon X4 845

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9610 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD Athlon X4 845
Samsung Exynos 9610 AMD Athlon X4 845

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 9610 or AMD Athlon X4 845 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 was released in Q4/2018.

The AMD Athlon X4 845 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Athlon X4 845 was released in Q1/2016.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family AMD Athlon (29)
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) CPU group AMD Athlon X4 (Carizzo) (2)
3 Generation 2
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Carizzo
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9610 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. The AMD Athlon X4 845 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz).

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 845
8 Cores 4
8 Threads 4
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
A-Core 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz)
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 845
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU no iGPU
0.85 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation --
16 nm Technology
1 Max. displays
3 Compute units --
48 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Samsung Exynos 9610 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The AMD Athlon X4 845 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 845
LPDDR4X-1600 Memory DDR3-2133
Max. Memory
0 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 34.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 8
-- PCIe Bandwidth 7.9 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD Athlon X4 845 is 65 W.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 845
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 65 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD Athlon X4 845 cache has a total of 2.00 MB.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 845
10 nm Technology 28 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE3
-- Socket FM2+
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q4/2018 Release date Q1/2016
-- Release price 65 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9610 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD Athlon X4 845 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9610 (54%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 9610 (62%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
329 (55%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz
603 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1164 (64%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz
1832 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
370 (53%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz
695 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1095 (62%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz
1772 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
2235 (59%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz
3794 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (100%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
171465 (100%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz
93 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz
316 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9610 AMD Athlon X4 845
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Athlon II X4 860KAMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon II X4 860K vs AMD Athlon X4 845
2. AMD Athlon X4 845AMD A8-7600 AMD Athlon X4 845 vs AMD A8-7600
3. AMD Athlon X4 845Intel Pentium G4400 AMD Athlon X4 845 vs Intel Pentium G4400
4. AMD Athlon X4 845AMD FX-4300 AMD Athlon X4 845 vs AMD FX-4300
5. AMD Ryzen 3 1200AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Ryzen 3 1200 vs AMD Athlon X4 845
6. Intel Core i3-6100AMD Athlon X4 845 Intel Core i3-6100 vs AMD Athlon X4 845
7. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
8. AMD Athlon X4 845AMD FX-6300 AMD Athlon X4 845 vs AMD FX-6300
9. AMD Ryzen 3 1300XAMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs AMD Athlon X4 845
10. AMD Athlon X4 845AMD FX-4100 AMD Athlon X4 845 vs AMD FX-4100


back to index