Samsung Exynos 5250 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 5250 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 5250 or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 5250 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 5250 was released in Q4/2011. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G was released in Q1/2018. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28) |
| Samsung Exynos 5250 (1) | CPU group | AMD Ryzen 2000G (5) |
| 2 | Generation | 1 |
| Cortex-A15 | Architecture | Raven Ridge (Zen) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 5250 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 5250 is 1.70 GHz while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 4 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is at 3.60 GHz (3.90 GHz). |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5250 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.70 GHz | Frequency | 3.60 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.90 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.70 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe Samsung Exynos 5250 or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-T604 MP4 | GPU | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (Raven Ridge) |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU frequency | 1.25 GHz |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 1 | GPU Generation | 8 |
| 32nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| 1 | Max. displays | 3 |
| 4 | Compute units | 11 |
| 64 | Shader | 704 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T604 MP4 | GPU | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (Raven Ridge) |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 5250 can use up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 46.9 GB/s. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5250 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
| LPDDR3-800 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 11.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Samsung Exynos 5250 is --, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5250 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | 46 W |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 95 °C |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 5250 is manufactured in 32 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 4.00 MB cache. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5250 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
| 32 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| -- | Socket | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2011 | Release date | Q1/2018 |
| -- | Release price | 165 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
ARM Mali-T604 MP4 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (Raven Ridge) @ 1.25 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 5250 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
