Samsung Exynos 4212 vs Intel Celeron 3965Y
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 4212 | Intel Celeron 3965Y | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 4212 or Intel Celeron 3965Y - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 4212 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 4212 was released in Q3/2011. The Intel Celeron 3965Y has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 3965Y was released in Q2/2017. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
| Samsung Exynos 4212 (1) | CPU group | Intel Celeron 3000 (10) |
| 2 | Generation | 7 |
| Cortex-A9 | Architecture | Kaby Lake U |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 4212 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.50 GHz. The Intel Celeron 3965Y has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.50 GHz. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 4212 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 3965Y |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.50 GHz | Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 615 |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.30 GHz |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.85 GHz |
| Utgard | GPU Generation | 9.5 |
| 28nm | Technology | 14nm |
| 1 | Max. displays | 3 |
| 4 | Compute units | 24 |
| 64 | Shader | 192 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 16 GB |
| 0 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 615 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 4212 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 3965Y can connect up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 4212 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 3965Y |
| LPDDR2-400 | Memory | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 10 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 9.9 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 4212 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Celeron 3965Y is 6 W. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 4212 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 3965Y |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 6 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | 4.5 W |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 4212 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the Intel Celeron 3965Y cache has a total of 2.00 MB. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 4212 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 3965Y |
| 32 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| -- | Socket | BGA 1515 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2011 | Release date | Q2/2017 |
| -- | Release price | 107 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
ARM Mali-400 MP4 @ 0.40 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron 3965Y
Intel HD Graphics 615 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 3965Y
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 3965Y
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 3965Y
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 4212 | Intel Celeron 3965Y |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
