Samsung Exynos 3475 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Intel Xeon Gold 6210U | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 3475 or Intel Xeon Gold 6210U - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 3475 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 3475 was released in 2015. The Intel Xeon Gold 6210U has 20 cores with 40 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Gold 6210U was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | Intel Xeon Gold (163) |
| Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) | CPU group | Intel Xeon Gold 5200/6200 (55) |
| 3 | Generation | 2 |
| Cortex-A7 | Architecture | Cascade Lake |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 3475 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.30 GHz. The Intel Xeon Gold 6210U has 20 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz (3.90 GHz). |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Gold 6210U |
| 4 | Cores | 20 |
| 4 | Threads | 40 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.50 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.90 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.50 GHz |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 3 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 1 | Compute units | -- |
| 16 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 3475 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Gold 6210U can connect up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Gold 6210U |
| LPDDR3-400 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. Memory | 1024 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 140.7 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 27.50 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 48 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 3475 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Xeon Gold 6210U is 150 W. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Gold 6210U |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 150 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 3475 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6210U cache has a total of 27.50 MB. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Gold 6210U |
| 28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| 2015 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 1500 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
20C 40T @ 2.50 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
20C 40T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
20C 40T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
20C 40T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 3475 | Intel Xeon Gold 6210U |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
