Samsung Exynos 3475 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6138T

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 3475 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
Samsung Exynos 3475 Intel Xeon Gold 6138T

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 3475 or Intel Xeon Gold 6138T - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 3475 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 3475 was released in 2015.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6138T has 20 cores with 40 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to 768 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Gold 6138T was released in Q3/2017.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family Intel Xeon Gold (163)
Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) CPU group Intel Xeon Gold 5100/6100 (34)
3 Generation 1
Cortex-A7 Architecture Skylake
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 3475 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.30 GHz. The Intel Xeon Gold 6138T has 20 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.70 GHz).

Samsung Exynos 3475 Characteristic Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
4 Cores 20
4 Threads 40
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
1.30 GHz Frequency 2.00 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.70 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 2.80 GHz

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Samsung Exynos 3475 Characteristic Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-T720 MP1 GPU no iGPU
0.60 GHz GPU frequency --
0.60 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
Midgard 3 GPU Generation --
28nm Technology
2 Max. displays
1 Compute units --
16 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
11 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-T720 MP1 GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Samsung Exynos 3475 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Gold 6138T can connect up to 768 GB of memory in 6 memory channels.

Samsung Exynos 3475 Characteristic Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
LPDDR3-400 Memory DDR4-2666
Max. Memory 768 GB
0 Memory channels 6 (Hexa Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 128.1 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 28.00 MB
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 48
-- PCIe Bandwidth 47.3 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 3475 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Xeon Gold 6138T is 125 W.

Samsung Exynos 3475 Characteristic Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 125 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 3475 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6138T cache has a total of 28.00 MB.

Samsung Exynos 3475 Characteristic Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
28 nm Technology 14 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv7-A (32 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
-- Socket LGA 3647
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
2015 Release date Q3/2017
-- Release price 2750 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 3475 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon Gold 6138T to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 3475 Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
20C 40T @ 3.70 GHz
1030 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 3475 Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
20C 40T @ 2.80 GHz
11988 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 3475 Samsung Exynos 3475
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz
10 (100%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 3475 Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
20C 40T @ 2.80 GHz
24812 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 3475 Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
20C 40T @ 3.70 GHz
161 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 3475 Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
20C 40T @ 2.80 GHz
3069 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 3475 Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Xeon Gold 6138TIntel Xeon E7-4880 v2 Intel Xeon Gold 6138T vs Intel Xeon E7-4880 v2
2. Intel Xeon Gold 6138TIntel Core i7-8750H Intel Xeon Gold 6138T vs Intel Core i7-8750H
3. Intel Core i3-7100TIntel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Core i3-7100T vs Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
4. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950XIntel Xeon Gold 6138T AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
5. Intel Xeon Gold 6138TAMD FX-8370E Intel Xeon Gold 6138T vs AMD FX-8370E
6. Intel Celeron N3000Intel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Celeron N3000 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
7. Intel Pentium G4600TIntel Xeon Gold 6138T Intel Pentium G4600T vs Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
8. Intel Xeon Gold 6138TIntel Celeron N2820 Intel Xeon Gold 6138T vs Intel Celeron N2820
9. Samsung Exynos 3475Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 Samsung Exynos 3475 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Samsung Exynos 3475 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 3475


back to index