Samsung Exynos 3110 vs Intel Celeron 430
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 3110 | Intel Celeron 430 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Samsung Exynos 3110 and the Intel Celeron 430 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Samsung Exynos 3110 1 core processor released in 2009 with the Intel Celeron 430 which has 1 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2007. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
| Samsung Exynos 3100 (1) | CPU group | Intel Celeron 400 (4) |
| 1 | Generation | 1 |
| Cortex-A8 | Architecture | Conroe (Core) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 3110 is a 1 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.00 GHz. The processor can compute 1 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron 430 clocks with 1.80 GHz, has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 1 threads in parallel. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3110 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 430 |
| 1 | Cores | 1 |
| 1 | Threads | 1 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.00 GHz | Frequency | 1.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| PowerVR SGX540 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.20 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.20 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| 45nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 1 | Compute units | -- |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 10.1 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| PowerVR SGX540 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Samsung Exynos 3110, while the Intel Celeron 430 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s enabled. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3110 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 430 |
| LPDDR2-400 | Memory | DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 0.50 MB | L2 Cache | 0.50 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Samsung Exynos 3110 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Celeron 430 is 35 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3110 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 430 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 35 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 3110 has 0.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron 430 is at 0.50 MB. The processor is manufactured in 65 nm. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 3110 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 430 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 65 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 775 |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| 2009 | Release date | Q2/2007 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3110
PowerVR SGX540 @ 0.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3110
1C 1T @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 3110 | Intel Celeron 430 |
| Samsung Google Nexus S Samsung Galaxy S 4G |
Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
