Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ vs AMD EPYC 7313P

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7313P
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ AMD EPYC 7313P

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ and the AMD EPYC 7313P and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ 8 core processor released in Q3/2020 with the AMD EPYC 7313P which has 16 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2021.
Qualcomm Snapdragon (104) Family AMD EPYC (129)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865/870 (3) CPU group AMD EPYC 7003 (29)
7 Generation 3
Kryo 585 Architecture Milan (Zen 3)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.10 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 7313P clocks with 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz), has 16 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 7313P
8 Cores 16
8 Threads 32
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
3.10 GHz
1x Kryo 585 Prime
A-Core 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz)
16x Zen 3
2.42 GHz
3x Kryo 585 Gold
B-Core --
1.80 GHz
4x Kryo 585 Silver
C-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 7313P
Qualcomm AI engine AI hardware --
Hexagon 698 @ 15 TOPS AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Qualcomm Adreno 650 GPU no iGPU
0.25 GHz GPU frequency --
0.67 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
6 GPU Generation --
7 nm Technology
1 Max. displays
2 Compute units --
512 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
12.0 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Qualcomm Adreno 650 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 4 memory channels is supported by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+, while the AMD EPYC 7313P supports a maximum of 4096 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s enabled.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 7313P
LPDDR5-5500, LPDDR4X-4266 Memory DDR4-3200
16 GB Max. Memory 4096 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
44.0 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 204.8 GB/s
No ECC Yes
2.00 MB L2 Cache --
3.00 MB L3 Cache 128.00 MB
-- PCIe version 4.0
-- PCIe lanes 128
-- PCIe Bandwidth 252.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ has a TDP of 10 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 7313P is 155 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 7313P
10 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 155 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up 180 W
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ has 5.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 7313P is at 128.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 7313P
7 nm Technology 7 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
-- Socket SP3
None Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2020 Release date Q1/2021
-- Release price 913 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.3 stars (3 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7313P to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (72%)
AMD EPYC 7313P (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (19%)
AMD EPYC 7313P (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
985 (71%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
1382 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
3275 (16%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.40 GHz
20812 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
1248 (72%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
1722 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
3129 (21%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.40 GHz
14863 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
Qualcomm Adreno 650 @ 0.67 GHz
1418 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
716498 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
616032 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.40 GHz
42067 (100%)

AI performance (NPU)

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
8C 8T @ 3.10 GHz
15 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7313P AMD EPYC 7313P
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ AMD EPYC 7313P
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 T870
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 T875
ASUS ZenFone 7 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold
Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+Apple A14 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ vs Apple A14 Bionic
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+Apple A12 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ vs Apple A12 Bionic
3. Samsung Exynos 2100Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
5. Apple A12Z BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Apple A12Z Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
6. Apple A13 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GQualcomm Snapdragon 865+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
10. MediaTek Dimensity 1200Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+


back to index