Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y

CPU comparison

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G or Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. Up to 6 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G was released in Q1/2022.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y was released in Q2/2019.
Qualcomm Snapdragon (103) Family Intel Xeon Platinum (89)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (1) CPU group Intel Xeon Platinum 8200/9200 (21)
9 Generation 2
Kryo 660 Architecture Cascade Lake
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G is 2.20 GHz while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y has 24 CPU cores and 48 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y is at 2.40 GHz (3.90 GHz).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
8 Cores 24
8 Threads 48
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.20 GHz
2x Kryo 660 Gold
A-Core 2.40 GHz (3.90 GHz)
1.70 GHz
6x Kryo 660 Silver
B-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G or Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

Qualcomm Adreno 619 (6nm) GPU no iGPU
0.95 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
6 nm Technology
0 Max. displays
-- Compute units --
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
12.1 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Qualcomm Adreno 619 (6nm) GPU no iGPU
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode Codec VP9 No
Decode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G can use up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.0 GB/s. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 140.7 GB/s.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
LPDDR4X-2133 Memory DDR4-2933
6 GB Max. Memory 1024 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 6 (Hexa Channel)
17.0 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 140.7 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 35.75 MB
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 48
-- PCIe Bandwidth 47.3 GB/s

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G is --, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y has a TDP of 165 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 165 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G is manufactured in 6 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 35.75 MB cache.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Characteristic Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
6 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
-- Socket LGA 3647
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2022 Release date Q2/2019
250 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.8 stars (53 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (59%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (10%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
669 (59%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz
1128 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1928 (10%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz
19402 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
894 (100%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
2044 (100%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz
366 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
361205 (100%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
4389 (100%)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Intel Xeon Platinum 8260Y
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GMediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs MediaTek Helio G99
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 855 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GMediaTek Helio G96 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs MediaTek Helio G96
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 870Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 765G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G


back to index