Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Google Tensor G2

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G was developed as an efficient solution for the mid-range. Production takes place in a 6-nanometer process by Qualcomm using the Kryo 660 architecture.

In technical measurements, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G shows solid performance in everyday tasks, but lags significantly behind high-end chips. Since the difference in single-core and multi-core calculations is well over ten percent compared to the competitor, the computing power is designed for standard applications.

The integrated Qualcomm Adreno 619 graphics unit enables smooth processes in simple programs, but reaches its limits with complex graphic calculations. Due to its focus on energy efficiency, the thermal load remains low, which benefits battery life in mobile devices. The Google Tensor G2 is designed for use in high-quality mobile devices.

Manufactured in a 5-nanometer process by ARM, this chip offers a high processing speed thanks to the G2 architecture and Level 2 and Level 3 cache. When analyzing computing power, the Google Tensor G2 outperforms the competitor in both single-core and multi-core performance by more than ten percent.

The integrated ARM Mali-G710 MP7 graphics unit ensures a more stable frame rate in graphics-intensive scenarios. With a memory bandwidth of 53 GB/s, data transfer is fast, which helps with demanding tasks. Despite the higher performance, the thermal output under load is more intense than with the mid-range model, which must be taken into account for cooling.

In summary, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G offers good value for money for everyday stability. The Google Tensor G2 is recommended for users who need higher computing power for games. The Google model clearly wins the comparison in almost all performance categories.