MediaTek MT8317T vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


MediaTek MT8317T CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
MediaTek MT8317T Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the MediaTek MT8317T and the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the MediaTek MT8317T 2 core processor released in Q3/2013 with the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 which has 12 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2016.
Mediatek MT-Serie (72) Family Intel Xeon E5 (71)
MediaTek MT83xx A9 (3) CPU group Intel Xeon E5 v4 (24)
1 Generation 6
Cortex-A9 Architecture Broadwell E
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The MediaTek MT8317T is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.20 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 clocks with 2.20 GHz (2.90 GHz), has 12 CPU cores and can calculate 24 threads in parallel.

MediaTek MT8317T Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
2 Cores 12
2 Threads 24
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
1.20 GHz Frequency 2.20 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 2.90 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 2.50 GHz

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

MediaTek MT8317T Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

PowerVR SGX531 GPU no iGPU
0.52 GHz GPU frequency --
0.52 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
65nm Technology
1 Max. displays
1 Compute units --
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
10.1 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

PowerVR SGX531 GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the MediaTek MT8317T, while the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 supports a maximum of 1536 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s enabled.

MediaTek MT8317T Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Memory DDR4-2400
Max. Memory 1536 GB
0 Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 30.00 MB
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 40
-- PCIe Bandwidth 39.4 GB/s

Thermal Management

The MediaTek MT8317T has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 is 105 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

MediaTek MT8317T Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 105 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The MediaTek MT8317T has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 40 nm. The cache of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 is at 30.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

MediaTek MT8317T Characteristic Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
40 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv7-A (32 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
-- Socket LGA 2011-3
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2013 Release date Q1/2016
-- Release price 1166 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the MediaTek MT8317T to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (6 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz
811 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz
7953 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz
1002 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz
6528 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
PowerVR SGX531 @ 0.52 GHz
4 (100%)
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz
14028 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz
121 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz
1589 (100%)

Devices using this processor

MediaTek MT8317T Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
2. Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
3. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
4. Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
5. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4Intel Core i7-6700K Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Intel Core i7-6700K
6. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
7. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
8. Intel Xeon Gold 5118Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon Gold 5118 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
9. Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
10. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4Intel Xeon Silver 4116 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4116


back to index