MediaTek MT8125 vs AMD EPYC 7272
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek MT8125 | AMD EPYC 7272 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the MediaTek MT8125 and the AMD EPYC 7272 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the MediaTek MT8125 4 core processor released in Q4/2013 with the AMD EPYC 7272 which has 12 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2019. |
||
| Mediatek MT-Serie (72) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| MediaTek MT81xx A7 (5) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Cortex-A7 | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek MT8125 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.20 GHz. The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 7272 clocks with 2.90 GHz (3.20 GHz), has 12 CPU cores and can calculate 24 threads in parallel. |
||
| MediaTek MT8125 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.90 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.10 GHz |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| PowerVR SGX544 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.26 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.26 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| 45nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 2 | Compute units | -- |
| 4 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 10.1 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| PowerVR SGX544 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the MediaTek MT8125, while the AMD EPYC 7272 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled. |
||
| MediaTek MT8125 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| LPDDR2 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 0 | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 64.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe MediaTek MT8125 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 7272 is 120 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| MediaTek MT8125 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 120 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek MT8125 has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 7272 is at 64.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm. |
||
| MediaTek MT8125 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| -- | Socket | SP3 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2013 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 990 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
MediaTek MT8125
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek MT8125
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
MediaTek MT8125
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
MediaTek MT8125
PowerVR SGX544 @ 0.26 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
MediaTek MT8125
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek MT8125 | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
