Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Xeon W-3365 vs Intel Core 9 processor 270H
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon W-3365 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Xeon W (97) | Intel Core 7 (11) |
| CPU group | Intel Xeon W-3300 (5) | Intel Core processors - Mobile (Series 2) (6) |
| Architecture | Ice Lake W | Raptor Lake |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Enterprise / Embedded | Notebook |
| Socket | LGA 4189 | BGA 1744 |
| Predecessor | Intel Xeon W-3265 | |
| Successor | Intel Xeon w7-3465X |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon W-3365 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 14 / 20 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 32x 2.70 - 4.00 GHz |
6x Golden Cove 2.70 - 5.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Gracemont 2.00 - 4.10 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 40.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 48.00 MB | 24.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon W-3365 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (96 EUs) |
| GPU frequency | 0.00 - 1.55 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 96 / 768 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 4 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 96 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon W-3365 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel Deep Learning Boost (Intel DL Boost) CPU | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon W-3365 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-3200 (204.8 GB/s) | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) LPDDR5X-6400 (102.4 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (68.3 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4096 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory channels | 8 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 64 | 5.0 x 28 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 126.0 GB/s | 110.3 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon W-3365 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 270 W | 45 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 115 W | |
| TDP down | 35 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Xeon W-3365 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q3/2021 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | 3499 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Xeon W-3365 is 2.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Core 9 processor 270H has received 5.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core 9 processor 270H
14C / 20T · 5.80 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
9
Intel Xeon W-3365
32C / 64T · 4.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
5
16 C / 16 T · 4.70 GHz VS Intel Core 9 processor 270H
14 C / 20 T · 5.80 GHz
7
16 C / 16 T · 5.10 GHz VS Intel Core 9 processor 270H
14 C / 20 T · 5.80 GHz
