Intel Xeon W-3265 vs MediaTek MT6752M

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon W-3265 CPU1 vs CPU2 MediaTek MT6752M
Intel Xeon W-3265 MediaTek MT6752M

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Xeon W-3265 and the MediaTek MT6752M and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Xeon W-3265 24 core processor released in Q2/2019 with the MediaTek MT6752M which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2014.
Intel Xeon W (83) Family Mediatek MT-Serie (72)
Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) CPU group MediaTek MT67xx (17)
7 Generation 1
Cascade Lake W Architecture Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
Intel Xeon W-3365 Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Xeon W-3265 is a 24 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.70 GHz (4.60 GHz). The processor can compute 48 threads at the same time. The MediaTek MT6752M clocks with 1.50 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Intel Xeon W-3265 Characteristic MediaTek MT6752M
24 Cores 8
48 Threads 8
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.70 GHz Frequency 1.50 GHz
4.60 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
3.60 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Xeon W-3265 Characteristic MediaTek MT6752M
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T760 MP2
GPU frequency 0.70 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.70 GHz
-- GPU Generation Midgard 3
Technology 28nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 2
-- Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T760 MP2
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 1024 GB of memory in a maximum of 6 memory channels is supported by the Intel Xeon W-3265, while the MediaTek MT6752M supports a maximum of 4 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 6.4 GB/s enabled.

Intel Xeon W-3265 Characteristic MediaTek MT6752M
DDR4-2933 Memory LPDDR3-800
1024 GB Max. Memory 4 GB
6 (Hexa Channel) Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
140.7 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 6.4 GB/s
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
33.00 MB L3 Cache --
3.0 PCIe version --
64 PCIe lanes --
63.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Xeon W-3265 has a TDP of 205 W. The TDP of the MediaTek MT6752M is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Xeon W-3265 Characteristic MediaTek MT6752M
205 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Xeon W-3265 has 33.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of MediaTek MT6752M is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm.

Intel Xeon W-3265 Characteristic MediaTek MT6752M
14 nm Technology 28 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 ISA extensions --
LGA 3647 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2019 Release date Q3/2014
3320 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Xeon W-3265 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the MediaTek MT6752M to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3265 (100%)
MediaTek MT6752M (11%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3265 (100%)
MediaTek MT6752M (4%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-3265 Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 4.60 GHz
1211 (100%)
MediaTek MT6752M MediaTek MT6752M
8C 8T @ 1.50 GHz
129 (11%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-3265 Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz
19968 (100%)
MediaTek MT6752M MediaTek MT6752M
8C 8T @ 1.50 GHz
769 (4%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-3265 Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 4.60 GHz
437 (100%)
MediaTek MT6752M MediaTek MT6752M
8C 8T @ 1.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-3265 Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz
9723 (100%)
MediaTek MT6752M MediaTek MT6752M
8C 8T @ 1.50 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Xeon W-3265 Intel Xeon W-3265
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
MediaTek MT6752M MediaTek MT6752M
ARM Mali-T760 MP2 @ 0.70 GHz
40 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon W-3265 Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz
30128 (100%)
MediaTek MT6752M MediaTek MT6752M
8C 8T @ 1.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Xeon W-3265 MediaTek MT6752M
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Xeon W-3265Intel Core i9-9900K Intel Xeon W-3265 vs Intel Core i9-9900K
2. Intel Xeon W-3265Intel Xeon W-3245 Intel Xeon W-3265 vs Intel Xeon W-3245
3. AMD EPYC 7543PIntel Xeon W-3265 AMD EPYC 7543P vs Intel Xeon W-3265
4. AMD Athlon 3000GIntel Xeon W-3265 AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Xeon W-3265
5. AMD G-T56NIntel Xeon W-3265 AMD G-T56N vs Intel Xeon W-3265
6. Intel Core i5-4430SIntel Xeon W-3265 Intel Core i5-4430S vs Intel Xeon W-3265
7. AMD Ryzen 9 3950XIntel Xeon W-3265 AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs Intel Xeon W-3265
8. Intel Xeon W-3265Intel Core i3-9100F Intel Xeon W-3265 vs Intel Core i3-9100F
9. Intel Core i7-8700Intel Xeon W-3265 Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Xeon W-3265
10. Intel Xeon W-3265Intel Core i7-4790S Intel Xeon W-3265 vs Intel Core i7-4790S


back to index