Intel Xeon Silver 4215R vs Samsung Exynos 4212
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon Silver 4215R | Samsung Exynos 4212 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon Silver 4215R or Samsung Exynos 4212 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon Silver 4215R has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. Up to 1024 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Silver 4215R was released in Q1/2020. The Samsung Exynos 4212 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 4212 was released in Q3/2011. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver (32) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4200 (11) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 4212 (1) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Cascade Lake | Architecture | Cortex-A9 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon Silver 4215R has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Silver 4215R is 3.20 GHz (4.00 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 4212 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 4212 is at 1.50 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver 4215R | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 8 | Cores | 2 |
| 16 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Xeon Silver 4215R or Samsung Exynos 4212 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.40 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon Silver 4215R can use up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 115.2 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 4212 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver 4215R | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| DDR4-2400 | Memory | LPDDR2-400 |
| 1024 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 115.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 11.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 48 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 47.3 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon Silver 4215R is 130 W, while the Samsung Exynos 4212 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver 4215R | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 130 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon Silver 4215R is manufactured in 14 nm and has 11.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 4212 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver 4215R | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2020 | Release date | Q3/2011 |
| 794 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz (4.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
ARM Mali-400 MP4 @ 0.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon Silver 4215R | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
