Intel Xeon Silver 4210T vs Samsung Exynos 3470
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon Silver 4210T | Samsung Exynos 3470 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon Silver 4210T or Samsung Exynos 3470 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon Silver 4210T has 10 cores with 20 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to 1024 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Silver 4210T was released in Q1/2020. The Samsung Exynos 3470 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 3470 was released in Q1/2014. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver (32) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4200 (11) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) |
| 2 | Generation | 3 |
| Cascade Lake | Architecture | Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4110 | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon Silver 4210T has 10 CPU cores and can calculate 20 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Silver 4210T is 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 3470 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 3470 is at 1.40 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver 4210T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| 10 | Cores | 4 |
| 20 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.30 GHz | Frequency | 1.40 GHz |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Xeon Silver 4210T or Samsung Exynos 3470 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.45 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon Silver 4210T can use up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 115.2 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 3470 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver 4210T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| DDR4-2400 | Memory | LPDDR3-400 |
| 1024 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 115.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 13.75 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 48 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 47.3 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon Silver 4210T is 95 W, while the Samsung Exynos 3470 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver 4210T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| 95 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon Silver 4210T is manufactured in 14 nm and has 13.75 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 3470 is manufactured in 28 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon Silver 4210T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2020 | Release date | Q1/2014 |
| 555 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
10C 20T @ 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4210T
10C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4210T
10C 20T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon Silver 4210T
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
ARM Mali-400 MP4 @ 0.45 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon Silver 4210T | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
