Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T vs Samsung Exynos 4210
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T | Samsung Exynos 4210 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon Platinum 8160T or Samsung Exynos 4210 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. Up to 768 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T was released in Q3/2017. The Samsung Exynos 4210 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 4210 was released in Q2/2011. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum (89) | Family | Samsung Exynos (46) |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8100 (16) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 4210 (1) |
| 1 | Generation | 1 |
| Skylake | Architecture | Cortex-A9 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T is a 24 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.10 GHz (3.70 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 4210 has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.40 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4210 |
| 24 | Cores | 2 |
| 48 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.10 GHz | Frequency | 1.40 GHz |
| 3.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.27 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.27 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T supports a maximum of 768 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 4210 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4210 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | LPDDR2-400 |
| 768 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 128.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 33.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 48 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 47.3 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T has a TDP of 150 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 4210 is --. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4210 |
| 150 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T has a 33.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 4210 cache has a total of 1.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4210 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q2/2011 |
| 4900 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
24C 48T @ 2.10 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 4210
ARM Mali-400 MP4 @ 0.27 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4210
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T
24C 48T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4210
2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T | Samsung Exynos 4210 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
