Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 14 cores with 28 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 was released in Q1/2016. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 was released in Q3/2013. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5 | Family | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Intel Xeon E5 v4 | CPU group | Intel Xeon E5 v2 |
| 6 | Generation | 4 |
| Broadwell E | Architecture | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 14 CPU cores and can calculate 28 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 is 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz) while the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 8 CPU cores and 16 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 is at --. |
||
| 14 | Cores | 8 |
| 28 | Threads | 16 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.40 GHz | Frequency | 2.60 GHz |
| 3.30 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.40 GHz |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.00 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| GPU (Turbo) | ||
| GPU Generation | ||
| Technology | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| Execution units | ||
| Shader | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| DirectX Version | ||
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 can use up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| DDR4-2400 | Memory | DDR3-1600 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| -- | Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| L2 Cache | ||
| 35.00 MB | L3 Cache | 20.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | 40 |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 is 120 W, while the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| 120 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 35.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 is manufactured in 22 nm and has a 35.00 MB cache. |
||
| 14 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | LGA 2011 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2016 | Release date | Q3/2013 |
| -- | Release price | 900 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
14C 28T @ 2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz (3.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C 28T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
