Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 HiSilicon Kirin 9000

CPU comparison

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 or HiSilicon Kirin 9000 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 12 cores with 24 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz. Up to 1536 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 was released in Q1/2016.

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.13 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 was released in Q4/2020.
Intel Xeon E5 (71) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
Intel Xeon E5 v4 (24) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (2)
6 Generation 9
Broadwell E Architecture Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 12 CPU cores and can calculate 24 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 is 2.20 GHz (2.90 GHz) while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is at 3.13 GHz.

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
12 Cores 8
24 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.20 GHz (2.90 GHz) A-Core 3.13 GHz
1x Cortex-A77
-- B-Core 2.54 GHz
3x Cortex-A77
-- C-Core 2.05 GHz
4x Cortex-A55

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 or HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G78 MP24
GPU frequency 0.76 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Vallhall 2
Technology 5 nm
Max. displays 1
-- Compute units 24
-- Shader 384
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G78 MP24
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 can use up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --.

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
DDR4-2400 Memory LPDDR5-2750, LPDDR4X-2133
1536 GB Max. Memory
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
76.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
30.00 MB L3 Cache --
3.0 PCIe version --
40 PCIe lanes --
39.4 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 is 105 W, while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
105 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 30.00 MB cache. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache.

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 9000
14 nm Technology 5 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 ISA extensions --
LGA 2011-3 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2016 Release date Q4/2020
1166 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (6 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.8 stars (16 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 (76%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (47%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz
811 (76%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
1063 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz
7953 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
3767 (47%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz
1002 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz
6528 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
ARM Mali-G78 MP24 @ 0.76 GHz
2332 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
683679 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz
14028 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz
121 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz
1589 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2. HiSilicon Kirin 9000Apple A14 Bionic HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Apple A14 Bionic
3. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
4. Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
5. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
7. HiSilicon Kirin 9000Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
8. Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
9. Apple M1HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Apple M1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
10. Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4Intel Core i7-6700K Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Intel Core i7-6700K


back to index