Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs Intel Atom N435
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Intel Atom N435 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E3-1270 or Intel Atom N435 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E3-1270 has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. Up to 32 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E3-1270 was released in Q2/2011. The Intel Atom N435 has 1 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.33 GHz. The CPU supports up to 2 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Intel Atom N435 was released in Q2/2011. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3 (43) | Family | Intel Atom (108) |
| Intel Xeon E3 (1) | CPU group | Intel Atom N400/N500 (3) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Sandy-Bridge | Architecture | Pineview |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E3-1270 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.40 GHz (3.80 GHz). The Intel Atom N435 has 1 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.33 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N435 |
| 4 | Cores | 1 |
| 8 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.40 GHz | Frequency | 1.33 GHz |
| 3.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel GMA 3150 |
| GPU frequency | 0.20 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| Technology | 45 | |
| Max. displays | 0 | |
| -- | Compute units | 2 |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel GMA 3150 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E3-1270 supports a maximum of 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom N435 can connect up to 2 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N435 |
| DDR3-1333 | Memory | DDR3-800, DDR2-667 |
| 32 GB | Max. Memory | 2 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 1 (Single Channel) |
| 21.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 0.50 MB |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 10.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon E3-1270 has a TDP of 80 W, that of the Intel Atom N435 is 5 W. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N435 |
| 80 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 5 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E3-1270 has a 8.00 MB cache, while the Intel Atom N435 cache has a total of 0.50 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N435 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE3, SSSE3 |
| LGA 1155 | Socket | BGA 559 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2011 | Release date | Q2/2011 |
| 339 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 8T @ 3.40 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
1C 2T @ 1.33 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Xeon E3-1270
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Atom N435
1C 2T @ 1.33 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E3-1270
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom N435
1C 2T @ 1.33 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E3-1270
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom N435
1C 2T @ 1.33 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Intel Atom N435 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
