Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Pentium 2030M vs Intel Core i7-4701EQ
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Pentium 2030M
42 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
Intel Core i7-4701EQ
100 %
4C / 8T · 3.40 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Pentium 2030M
22 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
Intel Core i7-4701EQ
100 %
4C / 8T · 3.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Pentium 2030M
67 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
Intel Core i7-4701EQ
100 %
4C / 8T · 3.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Pentium 2030M
36 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
Intel Core i7-4701EQ
100 %
4C / 8T · 3.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Pentium 2030M
33 %
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
Intel Core i7-4701EQ
100 %
Intel HD Graphics 4600
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium 2030M | Intel Core i7-4701EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Pentium (150) | Intel Core i7 (300) |
| CPU group | Intel Pentium 2000 (5) | Intel Core i 4000 (64) |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge U | Haswell S |
| Technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | PGA 988 | BGA 1364 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium 2030M | Intel Core i7-4701EQ |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 2.50 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.40 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.00 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium 2030M | Intel Core i7-4701EQ |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 - 1.10 GHz | 0.40 - 1.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 6 / 48 | 20 / 160 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2012 | Q2/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium 2030M | Intel Core i7-4701EQ |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium 2030M | Intel Core i7-4701EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3L-1333 (21.3 GB/s) DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3L-1333 (21.3 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | 3.0 x 16 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium 2030M | Intel Core i7-4701EQ |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | 47 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 90 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium 2030M | Intel Core i7-4701EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q1/2013 | Q2/2013 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Pentium 2030M is 4.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Core i7-4701EQ has received 5.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core i7-4701EQ
4C / 8T · 3.40 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
9
Intel Pentium 2030M
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
