Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i9-12900TE vs Intel Pentium B980
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i9-12900TE
100 %
16C / 24T · 4.80 GHz
Intel Pentium B980
17 %
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i9-12900TE
100 %
16C / 24T · 3.00 GHz
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i9-12900TE
100 %
16C / 24T · 4.80 GHz
Intel Pentium B980
24 %
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i9-12900TE
100 %
16C / 24T · 3.00 GHz
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i9-12900TE
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Intel Pentium B980
14 %
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Intel Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i9 (81) | Intel Pentium (150) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 12000 (34) | Intel Pentium 900 (10) |
| Architecture | Alder Lake S | Sandy Bridge U |
| Technology | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | LGA 1700 | PGA 988 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Intel Core i9-13900TE |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Intel Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 8x Golden Cove 1.10 - 4.80 GHz |
2x 2.40 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Gracemont 1.00 - 3.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 14.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 30.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Intel Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1) |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 1.55 GHz | 0.65 - 1.15 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 32 / 256 | 6 / 48 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2021 | Q2/2011 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Intel Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Intel Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-4800 (76.8 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 20 | 2.0 x 16 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Intel Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | 35 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 106 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 85 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i9-12900TE | Intel Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q1/2022 | Q2/2012 |
| Release price | 494 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i9-12900TE is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Pentium B980 has received 3.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Pentium B980
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Core i9-12900TE
16C / 24T · 4.80 GHz
Popular Comparisons
