Intel Core i7-990X vs Samsung Exynos 5250
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Core i7-990X | Samsung Exynos 5250 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Core i7-990X or Samsung Exynos 5250 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Core i7-990X has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.73 GHz. Up to 24 GB of memory is supported in 3 memory channels. The Intel Core i7-990X was released in Q1/2011. The Samsung Exynos 5250 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 5250 was released in Q4/2011. |
||
| Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition (24) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Core i7 900 (4) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 5250 (1) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Gulftown | Architecture | Cortex-A15 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Core i7-990X has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 12 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Core i7-990X is 3.46 GHz (3.73 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 5250 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 5250 is at 1.70 GHz. |
||
| Intel Core i7-990X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 6 | Cores | 2 |
| 12 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.46 GHz | Frequency | 1.70 GHz |
| 3.73 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Core i7-990X or Samsung Exynos 5250 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T604 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.53 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.53 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 1 |
| Technology | 32nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T604 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Core i7-990X can use up to 24 GB of memory in 3 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 5250 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Core i7-990X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| DDR3-1066 | Memory | LPDDR3-800 |
| 24 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 3 | Memory channels | 0 |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 1.50 MB | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 12.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Core i7-990X is 130 W, while the Samsung Exynos 5250 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Core i7-990X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 130 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Core i7-990X is manufactured in 32 nm and has 13.50 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 5250 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Core i7-990X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 1366 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2011 | Release date | Q4/2011 |
| 1059 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
6C 12T @ 3.46 GHz (3.73 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Core i7-990X
6C 12T @ 3.73 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Core i7-990X
6C 12T @ 3.46 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Core i7-990X
6C 12T @ 3.73 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Core i7-990X
6C 12T @ 3.46 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Core i7-990X
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
ARM Mali-T604 MP4 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Core i7-990X
6C 12T @ 3.46 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Core i7-990X
6C 12T @ 3.46 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Core i7-990X | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
