Intel Core i7-2675QM vs AMD EPYC 7642
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Core i7-2675QM | AMD EPYC 7642 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Core i7-2675QM and the AMD EPYC 7642 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Core i7-2675QM 4 core processor released in Q4/2011 with the AMD EPYC 7642 which has 48 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2019. |
||
| Intel Core i7 (298) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Core i 2000M (46) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Sandy Bridge H | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | AMD EPYC 7643 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Core i7-2675QM is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz (3.10 GHz). The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 7642 clocks with 2.30 GHz (3.30 GHz), has 48 CPU cores and can calculate 96 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Core i7-2675QM | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| 4 | Cores | 48 |
| 8 | Threads | 96 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.30 GHz |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.30 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.80 GHz |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 3000 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.65 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 1.20 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 6 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 32 nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 12 | Compute units | -- |
| 96 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 10.1 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 3000 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to 32 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Core i7-2675QM, while the AMD EPYC 7642 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled. |
||
| Intel Core i7-2675QM | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 32 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 21.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 6.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 8.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Core i7-2675QM has a TDP of 45 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 7642 is 225 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Core i7-2675QM | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| 45 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 225 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Core i7-2675QM has 6.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 7642 is at 256.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm. |
||
| Intel Core i7-2675QM | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| BGA 1224 | Socket | SP3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2011 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| 280 $ | Release price | 8000 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 8T @ 2.20 GHz (3.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
48C 96T @ 2.30 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
4C 8T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
4C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
4C 8T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
4C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
4C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
4C 8T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
Intel HD Graphics 3000 @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Core i7-2675QM | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
