Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i7-13705H vs AMD E1-1500
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i7-13705H
100 %
14C / 20T · 5.00 GHz
AMD E1-1500
7 %
2C / 2T · 1.48 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i7-13705H
100 %
14C / 20T · 4.40 GHz
AMD E1-1500
2 %
2C / 2T · 1.48 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i7-13705H
100 %
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
AMD E1-1500
4 %
AMD Radeon HD 7310
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-13705H | AMD E1-1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i7 (300) | AMD E (23) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 13000H (26) | AMD E1/E2-1000 (3) |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake H | Zacate (Bobcat) |
| Technology | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1744 | BGA 413 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-13705H | AMD E1-1500 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 6x Raptor Cove 2.40 - 5.00 GHz |
2x 1.48 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Gracemont 1.80 - 3.70 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 24.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-13705H | AMD E1-1500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake) | AMD Radeon HD 7310 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 1.50 GHz | 0.53 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 96 / 768 | 1 / 80 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 4 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2022 | Q2/2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-13705H | AMD E1-1500 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-13705H | AMD E1-1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) DDR5-5200 (83.2 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (68.2 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (8.5 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 96 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 28 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 110.3 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-13705H | AMD E1-1500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45 W | 18 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 115 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 35 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-13705H | AMD E1-1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q1/2013 |
| Release price | 502 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i7-13705H is 4.0 stars (3 ratings), while AMD E1-1500 has received 2.0 stars (9 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Core i7-13705H
14C / 20T · 5.00 GHz
9
AMD E1-1500
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
