Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i7-11375H vs MediaTek MT8392
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i7-11375H
100 %
4C / 8T · 5.00 GHz
MediaTek MT8392
6 %
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i7-11375H
100 %
4C / 8T · 4.60 GHz
MediaTek MT8392
6 %
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i7-11375H
100 %
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Tiger Lake)
MediaTek MT8392
2 %
ARM Mali-450 MP4
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-11375H | MediaTek MT8392 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i7 (300) | Mediatek MT-Serie (72) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 11000H (17) | MediaTek MT83xx A7 (6) |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake H | Cortex-A7 |
| Technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | BGA 1526 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-11375H | MediaTek MT8392 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 8x Cortex-A7 |
| Frequency: | 3.30 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 5.00 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 4.60 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 5.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 12.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-11375H | MediaTek MT8392 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Tiger Lake) | ARM Mali-450 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 1.35 GHz | 0.70 - 0.70 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 96 / 768 | 4 / 64 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 4 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | 28nm |
| Release date | Q3/2020 | 2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-11375H | MediaTek MT8392 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-11375H | MediaTek MT8392 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-4266 (68.2 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) | |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 0 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 4 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-11375H | MediaTek MT8392 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 28 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i7-11375H | MediaTek MT8392 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q1/2014 |
| Release price | 482 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i7-11375H is 5.0 stars (2 ratings), while MediaTek MT8392 has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core i7-11375H
4C / 8T · 5.00 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
9
MediaTek MT8392
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
