Intel Core i5-6442EQ vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Core i5-6442EQ | Samsung Exynos 9609 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Core i5-6442EQ or Samsung Exynos 9609 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Core i5-6442EQ has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i5-6442EQ was released in Q4/2015. The Samsung Exynos 9609 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9609 was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| Intel Core i5 (331) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Core i 6000H (15) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) |
| 6 | Generation | 3 |
| Skylake H | Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| Intel Core i5-7442EQ | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Core i5-6442EQ has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Core i5-6442EQ is 1.90 GHz (2.70 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 9609 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 9609 is at 2.20 GHz. |
||
| Intel Core i5-6442EQ | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.90 GHz (2.70 GHz) | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Core i5-6442EQ or Samsung Exynos 9609 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| 0.35 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz |
| 1.00 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 9 | GPU Generation | Bifrost 2 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 24 | Compute units | 3 |
| 192 | Shader | 48 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Core i5-6442EQ can use up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 34.1 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 9609 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Core i5-6442EQ | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| LPDDR3-1866, DDR4-2133 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1600 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 34.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 6.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 15.8 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Core i5-6442EQ is 25 W, while the Samsung Exynos 9609 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Core i5-6442EQ | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 25 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Core i5-6442EQ is manufactured in 14 nm and has 6.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 9609 is manufactured in 10 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Core i5-6442EQ | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 1440 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2015 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.90 GHz (2.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
4C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
Intel HD Graphics 530 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
4C 4T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
4C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Core i5-6442EQ | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
