Intel Core i5-4400E vs Samsung Exynos 1080
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Core i5-4400E | Samsung Exynos 1080 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Core i5-4400E or Samsung Exynos 1080 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Core i5-4400E has 2 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i5-4400E was released in Q3/2013. The Samsung Exynos 1080 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 1080 was released in Q4/2020. |
||
| Intel Core i5 (331) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Core i 4000 (64) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 1080 (1) |
| 4 | Generation | 5 |
| Haswell S | Architecture | Cortex-A78/-A78/-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Core i5-4400E is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.70 GHz (3.30 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 1080 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz. |
||
| Intel Core i5-4400E | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.70 GHz (3.30 GHz) | A-Core | 2.80 GHz 1x Cortex-A78 |
| -- | B-Core | 2.60 GHz 3x Cortex-A78 |
| -- | C-Core | 2.00 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | GPU | ARM Mali-G78 MP10 |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz |
| 1.00 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 7.5 | GPU Generation | Vallhall 2 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 20 | Compute units | 10 |
| 160 | Shader | 160 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11.1 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | GPU | ARM Mali-G78 MP10 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Core i5-4400E supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 1080 can connect up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Core i5-4400E | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| DDR3-1600 | Memory | LPDDR5, LPDDR4X |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 3.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 15.8 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Core i5-4400E has a TDP of 37 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 1080 is --. |
||
| Intel Core i5-4400E | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| 37 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Core i5-4400E has a 3.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 1080 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Core i5-4400E | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 1364 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2013 | Release date | Q4/2020 |
| 266 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Core i5-4400E
2C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Core i5-4400E
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Core i5-4400E
Intel HD Graphics 4600 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
ARM Mali-G78 MP10 @ 0.76 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Core i5-4400E
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Core i5-4400E
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Core i5-4400E | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
