Intel Celeron G5900TE vs Intel Atom Z3460
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron G5900TE | Intel Atom Z3460 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron G5900TE or Intel Atom Z3460 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron G5900TE has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron G5900TE was released in Q2/2020. The Intel Atom Z3460 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 4 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom Z3460 was released in Q1/2014. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | Intel Atom (108) |
| Intel Celeron G5000 (8) | CPU group | Intel Atom Z3400 (1) |
| 9 | Generation | 3 |
| Comet Lake S | Architecture | Merrifield |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| Intel Celeron G6900TE | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron G5900TE is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.00 GHz. The Intel Atom Z3460 has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of -- (1.60 GHz). |
||
| Intel Celeron G5900TE | Characteristic | Intel Atom Z3460 |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.00 GHz | Frequency | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 1.60 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.35 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 1.00 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 9.5 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 14 nm | Technology | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| 12 | Compute units | -- |
| 96 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron G5900TE supports a maximum of 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom Z3460 can connect up to 4 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Celeron G5900TE | Characteristic | Intel Atom Z3460 |
| DDR4-2400 | Memory | DDR3-1066 |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | 4 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 38.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 15.8 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron G5900TE has a TDP of 35 W, that of the Intel Atom Z3460 is --. |
||
| Intel Celeron G5900TE | Characteristic | Intel Atom Z3460 |
| 35 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | 90 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron G5900TE has a 2.00 MB cache, while the Intel Atom Z3460 cache has a total of 1.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Celeron G5900TE | Characteristic | Intel Atom Z3460 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| LGA 1200 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | |
| Q2/2020 | Release date | Q1/2014 |
| 53 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 3.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ -- (1.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron G5900TE
2C 2T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
Intel Atom Z3460
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Celeron G5900TE
Intel HD Graphics 610 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom Z3460
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron G5900TE
2C 2T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom Z3460
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron G5900TE
2C 2T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom Z3460
2C 2T @ 0.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron G5900TE | Intel Atom Z3460 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
