Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Atom N2100
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Atom N2100 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron E3400 or Intel Atom N2100 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron E3400 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E3400 was released in Q1/2010. The Intel Atom N2100 has 1 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 4 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Intel Atom N2100 was released in Q4/2011. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | Intel Atom (108) |
| Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | CPU group | Intel Atom N2000 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 3 |
| Wolfdale (Penryn) | Architecture | Cedarview |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron E3400 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz. The Intel Atom N2100 has 1 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N2100 |
| 2 | Cores | 1 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.60 GHz | Frequency | 1.60 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | PowerVR SGX545 |
| GPU frequency | 0.64 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| Technology | 32 | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 32 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 10.1 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | PowerVR SGX545 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron E3400 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom N2100 can connect up to 4 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N2100 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | DDR3-800 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | 4 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 1 (Single Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | 0.50 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron E3400 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the Intel Atom N2100 is 3.5 W. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N2100 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 3.5 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron E3400 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the Intel Atom N2100 cache has a total of 0.50 MB. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N2100 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | SSE3 |
| LGA 775 | Socket | BGA 559 |
| VT-x | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2010 | Release date | Q4/2011 |
| 42 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
1C 2T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Atom N2100
1C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom N2100
1C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom N2100
1C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3400
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom N2100
1C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Atom N2100 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
