Intel Celeron E3300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 928
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron E3300 | HiSilicon Kirin 928 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron E3300 and the HiSilicon Kirin 928 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Celeron E3300 2 core processor released in Q3/2009 with the HiSilicon Kirin 928 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2014. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Wolfdale (Penryn) | Architecture | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron E3300 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 928 clocks with 2.00 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3300 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 928 |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz 2x Core |
A-Core | 2.00 GHz 4x Cortex-A15 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A7 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 2 |
| Technology | 32nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron E3300, while the HiSilicon Kirin 928 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3300 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 928 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | LPDDR3-1600 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Celeron E3300 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 928 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3300 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 928 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron E3300 has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 928 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3300 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 928 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 775 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2009 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
| 47 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 928
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 928
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 928
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 928
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 928
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron E3300 | HiSilicon Kirin 928 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
