Intel Celeron 900 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron 900 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 650
Intel Celeron 900 HiSilicon Kirin 650

CPU comparison

Intel Celeron 900 or HiSilicon Kirin 650 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Celeron 900 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 0.80 GHz. Up to 4 GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 900 was released in Q1/2009.

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 was released in Q2/2016.
Intel Celeron (165) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
Intel Celeron 900 (1) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4)
1 Generation 4
Penryn-L Architecture Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron 900 is a 1 core processor with a clock frequency of 0.80 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz.

Intel Celeron 900 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 650
1 Cores 8
1 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
0.80 GHz A-Core 2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Celeron 900 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 650
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T830 MP2
GPU frequency 0.90 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Midgard 4
Technology 28nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 2
-- Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T830 MP2
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Celeron 900 supports a maximum of 4 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

Intel Celeron 900 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 650
DDR3L-1333 Memory LPDDR3-933
4 GB Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
10.7 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
1.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron 900 has a TDP of 35 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 650 is --.

Intel Celeron 900 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 650
35 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron 900 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 650 cache has a total of 0.00 MB.

Intel Celeron 900 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 650
45 nm Technology 16 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions --
PGA 478 Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Windows, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2009 Release date Q2/2016
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 900 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 650 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron 900 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (53%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron 900 (40%)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 900 Intel Celeron 900
1C 1T @ 0.80 GHz
306 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
163 (53%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron 900 Intel Celeron 900
1C 1T @ 0.80 GHz
307 (40%)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
763 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Celeron 900 Intel Celeron 900
1C 1T @ 0.80 GHz
237 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Celeron 900 Intel Celeron 900
1C 1T @ 0.80 GHz
243 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron 900 Intel Celeron 900
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz
61 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron 900 Intel Celeron 900
1C 1T @ 0.80 GHz
396 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron 900 HiSilicon Kirin 650
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GHiSilicon Kirin 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662HiSilicon Kirin 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
3. HiSilicon Kirin 650Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617
4. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 205HiSilicon Kirin 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 205 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
6. Apple M1HiSilicon Kirin 650 Apple M1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
7. HiSilicon Kirin 650Apple A10 Fusion HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Apple A10 Fusion
8. Intel Core i5-10400HiSilicon Kirin 650 Intel Core i5-10400 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
9. Intel Celeron N4505HiSilicon Kirin 650 Intel Celeron N4505 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
10. HiSilicon Kirin 650Intel Atom Z3735F HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Intel Atom Z3735F


back to index