Intel Celeron 420 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron 420 | HiSilicon Kirin 950 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron 420 or HiSilicon Kirin 950 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron 420 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 420 was released in Q2/2007. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 was released in Q4/2015. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Celeron 400 (4) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 950 (2) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Conroe (Core) | Architecture | Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron 420 is a 1 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron 420 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 950 |
| 1 | Cores | 8 |
| 1 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.60 GHz 1x Core |
A-Core | 2.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A72 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T880 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.90 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 4 |
| Technology | 16 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T880 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron 420 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Celeron 420 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 950 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | LPDDR4 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 0.50 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron 420 has a TDP of 35 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 950 is --. |
||
| Intel Celeron 420 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 950 |
| 35 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron 420 has a 0.50 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 950 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Celeron 420 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 950 |
| 65 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 775 | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2007 | Release date | Q4/2015 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
1C 1T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron 420
1C 1T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron 420
1C 1T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Celeron 420
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950
ARM Mali-T880 MP4 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron 420
1C 1T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron 420 | HiSilicon Kirin 950 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
