Intel Celeron 3965Y vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron 3965Y | HiSilicon Kirin 650 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron 3965Y or HiSilicon Kirin 650 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron 3965Y has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 3965Y was released in Q2/2017. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 was released in Q2/2016. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Celeron 3000 (10) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) |
| 7 | Generation | 4 |
| Kaby Lake U | Architecture | Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron 3965Y has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron 3965Y is 1.50 GHz while the HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 650 is at 2.00 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron 3965Y | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 650 |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.50 GHz | A-Core | 2.00 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Celeron 3965Y or HiSilicon Kirin 650 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 615 | GPU | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 |
| 0.30 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.90 GHz |
| 0.85 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 9.5 | GPU Generation | Midgard 4 |
| 14nm | Technology | 28nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 24 | Compute units | 2 |
| 192 | Shader | 32 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 16 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 615 | GPU | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron 3965Y can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Celeron 3965Y | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 650 |
| LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | Memory | LPDDR3-933 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 10 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 9.9 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron 3965Y is 6 W, while the HiSilicon Kirin 650 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Celeron 3965Y | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 650 |
| 6 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| 4.5 W | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron 3965Y is manufactured in 14 nm and has 2.00 MB cache. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is manufactured in 16 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Celeron 3965Y | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 650 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 1515 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2017 | Release date | Q2/2016 |
| 107 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron 3965Y
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron 3965Y
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Celeron 3965Y
Intel HD Graphics 615 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 650
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron 3965Y
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron 3965Y | HiSilicon Kirin 650 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
