Intel Celeron 3965U vs AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

Last updated: 2024-04-15

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron 3965U		AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
CPU comparison Intel Celeron 3965U or AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The Intel Celeron 3965U has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. Up to 32 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 3965U was released in Q1/2017. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS was released in Q1/2023.

Intel Celeron (165)	Family	AMD Ryzen 5 (85)
Intel Celeron 3000 (10)	CPU group	AMD Ryzen 7040 (21)
7	Generation	6
Kaby Lake U	Architecture	Phoenix (Zen 4)
Mobile	Segment	Mobile
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Intel Celeron 3965U is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS has 6 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 4.30 GHz (5.00 GHz).
Intel Celeron 3965U	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
2	Cores	6
2	Threads	12
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
No	Overclocking ?	No
2.20 GHz	Frequency	4.30 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	5.00 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	--

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Intel Celeron 3965U	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
--	AI hardware	AMD Ryzen AI
--	AI specifications	AMD dedicated AI XDNA Technology

Internal Graphics The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
Intel HD Graphics 610	GPU	AMD Radeon 760M
0.30 GHz	GPU frequency	0.80 GHz
0.90 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	2.60 GHz
9.5	GPU Generation	10
14 nm	Technology	4 nm
3	Max. displays	4
12	Compute units	8
96	Shader	512
No	Hardware Raytracing	Yes
No	Frame Generation	AMD FSR
32 GB	Max. GPU Memory	32 GB
12	DirectX Version	12

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
Intel HD Graphics 610	GPU	AMD Radeon 760M
Decode / Encode	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode	Codec h264	Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode	Codec VP9	Decode
Decode / Encode	Codec VP8	Decode
No	Codec AV1	Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode	Codec AVC	Decode
Decode	Codec VC-1	Decode
Decode / Encode	Codec JPEG	Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe The Intel Celeron 3965U supports a maximum of 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS can connect up to 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
Intel Celeron 3965U	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
LPDDR3-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600	Memory	DDR5-4800, DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-6400, LPDDR5X-7500
32 GB	Max. Memory	256 GB
2 (Dual Channel)	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
34.1 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	120.0 GB/s
No	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	6.00 MB
2.00 MB	L3 Cache	16.00 MB
2.0	PCIe version	4.0
10	PCIe lanes	20
5.0 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	39.4 GB/s
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron 3965U has a TDP of 15 W, that of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS is 54 W.
Intel Celeron 3965U	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
15 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	54 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
10 W	TDP down	35 W
100 °C	Tjunction max.	100 °C
Technical details The Intel Celeron 3965U has a 2.00 MB cache, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS cache has a total of 22.00 MB.
Intel Celeron 3965U	Characteristic	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
14 nm	Technology	4 nm
Monolithic	Chip design	Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2	ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,FMA3, AVX2, AVX512
BGA 1356	Socket	FP8
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
Yes	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q1/2017	Release date	Q1/2023
107 $	Release price	--

show more data		show more data

Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 4.30 GHz (5.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

Intel Celeron 3965U (25%)

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks

Intel Celeron 3965U (10%)

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	560 (31%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz	1802 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	1084 (14%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 4.30 GHz	7768 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	469 (19%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz	2478 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	832 (8%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 4.30 GHz	10357 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	Intel Celeron 3965U Intel HD Graphics 610 @ 0.90 GHz	173 (6%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS AMD Radeon 760M @ 2.60 GHz	2663 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	1732 (8%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 4.30 GHz	22864 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz	99 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz	702 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	86 (100%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	168 (100%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 4.30 GHz	0 (0%)

Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).


	Intel Celeron 3965U 2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS 6C 12T @ 4.30 GHz	10 (100%)

Devices using this processor
Intel Celeron 3965U	AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
2.		AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i5-13500H
3.		AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i5-12500H
4.		AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i5-13420H
5.		Intel Celeron 3965U vs Intel Celeron J1900
6.		Intel Celeron J4125 vs Intel Celeron 3965U
7.		Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron 3965U
8.		Intel Core i7-12650H vs AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
9.		AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
10.		Intel Celeron 3965U vs Intel Core i3-7100U