Intel Celeron 3765U vs AMD G-T48N Benchmark, comparison and differences


Intel Celeron 3765U		AMD G-T48N
CPU comparison In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron 3765U and the AMD G-T48N and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster. We compare the Intel Celeron 3765U 2 core processor released in Q2/2015 with the AMD G-T48N which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2011.

Intel Celeron (165)	Family	AMD G (38)
Intel Celeron 3000 (10)	CPU group	AMD G (13)
7	Generation	1
Kaby Lake U	Architecture	Ontario (Bobcat)
Mobile	Segment	Mobile
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Intel Celeron 3765U is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.90 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The AMD G-T48N clocks with 1.40 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.
Intel Celeron 3765U	Characteristic	AMD G-T48N
2	Cores	2
2	Threads	2
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	No
No	Overclocking ?	No
1.90 GHz	Frequency	1.40 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	--
--	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	--

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Intel Celeron 3765U	Characteristic	AMD G-T48N
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1)	GPU	AMD Radeon HD 6310
0.10 GHz	GPU frequency	0.49 GHz
0.80 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	--
8	GPU Generation	3
14 nm	Technology	40 nm
3	Max. displays	2
12	Compute units	1
96	Shader	80
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
2 GB	Max. GPU Memory	1 GB
11.2	DirectX Version	11

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1)	GPU	AMD Radeon HD 6310
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
Decode / Encode	Codec h264	Decode
No	Codec VP9	No
Decode	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec AVC	Decode
Decode	Codec VC-1	Decode
Decode	Codec JPEG	Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe Up to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron 3765U, while the AMD G-T48N supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 8.5 GB/s enabled.
Intel Celeron 3765U	Characteristic	AMD G-T48N
LPDDR3-1600, DDR3L-1600	Memory	DDR3-1066
16 GB	Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel)	Memory channels	1 (Single Channel)
25.6 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	8.5 GB/s
No	ECC	No
--	L2 Cache	--
2.00 MB	L3 Cache	1.00 MB
2.0	PCIe version	--
12	PCIe lanes	--
6.0 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	--
Thermal Management The Intel Celeron 3765U has a TDP of 15 W. The TDP of the AMD G-T48N is 18 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.
Intel Celeron 3765U	Characteristic	AMD G-T48N
15 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	18 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
10 W	TDP down	--
105 °C	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The Intel Celeron 3765U has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of AMD G-T48N is at 1.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 40 nm.
Intel Celeron 3765U	Characteristic	AMD G-T48N
14 nm	Technology	40 nm
Monolithic	Chip design	Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2	ISA extensions	SSE3, SSE4a
BGA 1168	Socket	--
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualization	AMD-V
Yes	AES-NI	No
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems
Q2/2015	Release date	Q1/2011
--	Release price	--

show more data		show more data

Intel Celeron 3765U 2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! AMD G-T48N 2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	Intel Celeron 3765U Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) @ 0.80 GHz	154 (100%)
	AMD G-T48N AMD Radeon HD 6310 @ 0.49 GHz	79 (51%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Celeron 3765U 2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz	443 (100%)
	AMD G-T48N 2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Celeron 3765U 2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz	868 (100%)
	AMD G-T48N 2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	Intel Celeron 3765U 2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz	370 (100%)
	AMD G-T48N 2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	Intel Celeron 3765U 2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz	642 (100%)
	AMD G-T48N 2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Intel Celeron 3765U 2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz	1265 (100%)
	AMD G-T48N 2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Celeron 3765U 2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz	77 (100%)
	AMD G-T48N 2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Celeron 3765U 2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz	148 (100%)
	AMD G-T48N 2C 2T @ 1.40 GHz	0 (0%)


1.		Intel Celeron 3765U vs Intel Celeron J1900
2.		AMD G-T40E vs AMD G-T48N
3.		AMD G-T48N vs AMD E2-3200
4.		AMD G-T48N vs AMD A8-3820
5.		AMD G-T48N vs AMD A8-4555M
6.		AMD G-T48N vs Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
7.		AMD Phenom II X2 565 vs AMD G-T48N
8.		AMD A8-7100 vs Intel Celeron 3765U
9.		AMD G-T48N vs Intel Celeron 2955U
10.		AMD G-T48N vs AMD FX-8350

Intel Celeron 3765U vs AMD G-T48N

CPU comparison with benchmarks

CPU comparison

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Internal Graphics

Hardware codec support

Memory & PCIe

Thermal Management

Technical details