Intel Atom Z3736F vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Atom Z3736F | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | |
CPU comparisonIntel Atom Z3736F or HiSilicon Kirin 9000E - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Atom Z3736F has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.16 GHz. Up to 2 GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The Intel Atom Z3736F was released in Q2/2014. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.13 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E was released in Q4/2020. |
||
| Intel Atom (108) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Atom Z3700 (16) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (2) |
| 4 | Generation | 9 |
| Bay Trail | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Atom Z3736F is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.33 GHz (2.16 GHz). The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.13 GHz. |
||
| Intel Atom Z3736F | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.33 GHz (2.16 GHz) | A-Core | 3.13 GHz 1x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | B-Core | 2.54 GHz 3x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | C-Core | 2.05 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | GPU | ARM Mali-G78 MP22 |
| 0.31 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz |
| 0.65 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 7 | GPU Generation | Vallhall 2 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 4 | Compute units | 22 |
| 32 | Shader | 352 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11.2 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | GPU | ARM Mali-G78 MP22 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Atom Z3736F supports a maximum of 2 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E can connect up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Atom Z3736F | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
| DDR3L-1333 | Memory | LPDDR5-2750, LPDDR4X-2133 |
| 2 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 10.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Atom Z3736F has a TDP of 4 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is --. |
||
| Intel Atom Z3736F | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
| 4 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Atom Z3736F has a 2.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Atom Z3736F | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
| 22 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 592 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Operating systems | Android | |
| Q2/2014 | Release date | Q4/2020 |
| 20 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.33 GHz (2.16 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Atom Z3736F
4C 4T @ 2.16 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Atom Z3736F
4C 4T @ 1.33 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Atom Z3736F
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.65 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
ARM Mali-G78 MP22 @ 0.76 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Atom Z3736F
4C 4T @ 1.33 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Atom Z3736F
4C 4T @ 1.33 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Atom Z3736F | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
