Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Core 9 processor 270H
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Atom E3827
2 %
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (96 EUs)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Intel Core 7 (11) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom E3800 (6) | Intel Core processors - Mobile (Series 2) (6) |
| Architecture | Bay Trail | Raptor Lake |
| Technology | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | BGA 1744 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 14 / 20 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 1.75 GHz |
6x Golden Cove 2.70 - 5.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Gracemont 2.00 - 4.10 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 24.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (96 EUs) |
| GPU frequency | 0.54 - 0.79 GHz | 0.00 - 1.55 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | 96 / 768 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 4 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 96 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q3/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel Deep Learning Boost (Intel DL Boost) CPU | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1333 (21.3 GB/s) | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) LPDDR5X-6400 (102.4 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (68.3 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 28 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 110.3 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 8 W | 45 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 115 W | |
| TDP down | 35 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom E3827 | Intel Core 9 processor 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q4/2013 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom E3827 is 1.0 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Core 9 processor 270H has received 5.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core 9 processor 270H
14C / 20T · 5.80 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
9
Intel Atom E3827
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
5
16 C / 16 T · 4.70 GHz VS Intel Core 9 processor 270H
14 C / 20 T · 5.80 GHz
7
16 C / 16 T · 4.90 GHz VS Intel Core 9 processor 270H
14 C / 20 T · 5.80 GHz
8
12 C / 12 T · 4.60 GHz VS Intel Core 9 processor 270H
14 C / 20 T · 5.80 GHz
