Intel Atom E3825 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Atom E3825 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
Intel Atom E3825 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G

CPU comparison

Intel Atom E3825 or HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Atom E3825 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.33 GHz. Up to 8 GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The Intel Atom E3825 was released in Q4/2013.

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.36 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G was released in Q2/2019.
Intel Atom (108) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
Intel Atom E3800 (6) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 810/820 (3)
4 Generation 6
Bay Trail Architecture Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Atom E3825 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.33 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.36 GHz.

Intel Atom E3825 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
2 Cores 8
2 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.33 GHz A-Core 2.36 GHz
4x Cortex-A76
-- B-Core 1.84 GHz
4x Cortex-A55

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Atom E3825 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
-- AI hardware HUAWEI HiAI 2.0
-- AI specifications Da Vinci Architecture. Ascend D110 Lite
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) GPU ARM Mali-G57 MP6
0.53 GHz GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
0.53 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
7 GPU Generation Vallhall 1
22 nm Technology 7 nm
2 Max. displays 2
4 Compute units 6
32 Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
11.2 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) GPU ARM Mali-G57 MP6
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Atom E3825 supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G can connect up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

Intel Atom E3825 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
DDR3L-1066 Memory LPDDR4X-2133
8 GB Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
8.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Atom E3825 has a TDP of 6 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G is 6 W.

Intel Atom E3825 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
6 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 6 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Atom E3825 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G cache has a total of 2.00 MB.

Intel Atom E3825 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
22 nm Technology 7 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions --
BGA 1170 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Operating systems Android
Q4/2013 Release date Q2/2019
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Atom E3825 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Atom E3825 (21%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Atom E3825 (10%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3825
2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz
133 (21%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
641 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3825
2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz
254 (10%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
2429 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3825
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.53 GHz
34 (5%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 @ 0.85 GHz
653 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3825
2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
384634 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3825
2C 2T @ 1.33 GHz
378 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Atom E3825 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
Unknown Huawei Honor 30S
Huawei P40 Lite 5G

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 865 HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
2. Intel Atom E3815Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3815 vs Intel Atom E3825
3. HiSilicon Kirin 810HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GHiSilicon Kirin 820 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
5. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
6. Intel Atom E3827Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Atom E3825
7. HiSilicon Kirin 980HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8. Intel Atom E3825AMD C-30 Intel Atom E3825 vs AMD C-30
9. AMD Athlon II X2 340Intel Atom E3825 AMD Athlon II X2 340 vs Intel Atom E3825
10. AMD Athlon 5350Intel Atom E3825 AMD Athlon 5350 vs Intel Atom E3825


back to index