Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom C5115 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5115 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Intel Core Ultra 9 (12) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom C5000 (5) | Intel Core Ultra 200H (5) |
| Architecture | Parker Ridge | Arrow Lake H |
| Technology | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 2106 | BGA 2049 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5115 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x 2.80 GHz |
6x Lion Cove 2.90 - 5.40 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Skymont 2.70 - 4.50 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 2x Crestmont 1.00 - 2.50 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 9.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 24.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5115 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel Arc 140T |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 2.35 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 64 / 1024 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 5 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2025 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5115 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost (OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT) | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 99 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5115 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2933 (46.9 GB/s) | LPDDR5X-8400 (134.4 GB/s) DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 32 | 5.0 x 28 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 31.5 GB/s | 110.3 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5115 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43 W | 45 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 115 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 35 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 110 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5115 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q2/2022 | Q1/2025 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom C5115 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has received 3.5 stars (202 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
8
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
16C / 16T · 5.40 GHz
9
Intel Atom C5115
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
