HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Samsung Exynos 3470
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Samsung Exynos 3470 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Samsung Exynos 3470 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the HiSilicon Kirin 950 8 core processor released in Q4/2015 with the Samsung Exynos 3470 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2014. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 (2) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) |
| 4 | Generation | 3 |
| Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Cortex-A7 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 950 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 3470 clocks with 1.40 GHz, has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| 8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 4 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A72 |
A-Core | 1.40 GHz 4x Cortex-A7 |
| 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| ARM Mali-T880 MP4 | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| 0.90 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.45 GHz |
| 0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 4 | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| 16 nm | Technology | 28nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 4 | Compute units | 4 |
| 64 | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T880 MP4 | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the HiSilicon Kirin 950, while the Samsung Exynos 3470 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| LPDDR4 | Memory | LPDDR3-400 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe HiSilicon Kirin 950 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 3470 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 950 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 16 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 3470 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| 16 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | -- |
| -- | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2015 | Release date | Q1/2014 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950
ARM Mali-T880 MP4 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
ARM Mali-400 MP4 @ 0.45 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
