HiSilicon Kirin 935 | AMD FX-8320 | |
CPU comparisonHiSilicon Kirin 935 or AMD FX-8320 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The HiSilicon Kirin 935 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 935 was released in Q1/2015. The AMD FX-8320 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-8320 was released in Q4/2012. |
||
HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | AMD FX (30) |
HiSilicon Kirin 930 (2) | CPU group | AMD FX-8000 (11) |
3 | Generation | 2 |
Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Vishera (Bulldozer) |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
-- | Predecessor | -- |
-- | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 935 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 935 is 2.20 GHz while the AMD FX-8320 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD FX-8320 is at 3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz). |
||
HiSilicon Kirin 935 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8320 |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
A-Core | 3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz) |
1.50 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe HiSilicon Kirin 935 or AMD FX-8320 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 | GPU | no iGPU |
0.68 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
0.68 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
Midgard 2 | GPU Generation | -- |
32nm | Technology | |
1 | Max. displays | |
4 | Compute units | -- |
64 | Shader | -- |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
-- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 | GPU | no iGPU |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
No | Codec VP9 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
No | Codec AV1 | No |
No | Codec AVC | No |
No | Codec VC-1 | No |
No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe HiSilicon Kirin 935 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The AMD FX-8320 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 29.9 GB/s. |
||
HiSilicon Kirin 935 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8320 |
LPDDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
Max. Memory | ||
2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
-- | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
No | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
-- | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
-- | PCIe version | -- |
-- | PCIe lanes | -- |
-- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 935 is --, while the AMD FX-8320 has a TDP of 125 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
HiSilicon Kirin 935 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8320 |
-- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 125 W |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
-- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 935 is manufactured in 28 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The AMD FX-8320 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 8.00 MB cache. |
||
HiSilicon Kirin 935 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8320 |
28 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
-- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
-- | Socket | AM3+ |
None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
No | AES-NI | Yes |
Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
Q1/2015 | Release date | Q4/2012 |
-- | Release price | 125 $ |
show more data | show more data | |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.68 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
@ 0.00 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.50 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
HiSilicon Kirin 935
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
HiSilicon Kirin 935 | AMD FX-8320 |
Unknown | Unknown |