HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs Intel Xeon D-1649N

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 925 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon D-1649N
HiSilicon Kirin 925 Intel Xeon D-1649N

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 925 or Intel Xeon D-1649N - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 was released in Q3/2014.

The Intel Xeon D-1649N has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon D-1649N was released in Q2/2019.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family Intel Xeon D (79)
HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) CPU group Intel Xeon D-1600 (8)
2 Generation 3
Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 Architecture Hewitt Lake
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 925 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.80 GHz. The Intel Xeon D-1649N has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz (3.00 GHz).

HiSilicon Kirin 925 Characteristic Intel Xeon D-1649N
8 Cores 8
8 Threads 16
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
1.80 GHz
4x Cortex-A15
A-Core 2.30 GHz (3.00 GHz)
1.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A7
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

HiSilicon Kirin 925 Characteristic Intel Xeon D-1649N
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU no iGPU
0.60 GHz GPU frequency --
0.60 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
Midgard 2 GPU Generation --
32nm Technology
1 Max. displays
4 Compute units --
64 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
11 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 925 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon D-1649N can connect up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

HiSilicon Kirin 925 Characteristic Intel Xeon D-1649N
LPDDR3-1600 Memory DDR4-2133
Max. Memory 128 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 34.1 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache 12.00 MB
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version 3.0
-- PCIe lanes 32
-- PCIe Bandwidth 31.5 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Xeon D-1649N is 45 W.

HiSilicon Kirin 925 Characteristic Intel Xeon D-1649N
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 45 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon D-1649N cache has a total of 12.00 MB.

HiSilicon Kirin 925 Characteristic Intel Xeon D-1649N
28 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv7-A (32 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
-- Socket BGA 1667
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2014 Release date Q2/2019
-- Release price 754 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 925 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon D-1649N to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 925 HiSilicon Kirin 925
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.60 GHz
77 (100%)
Intel Xeon D-1649N Intel Xeon D-1649N
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 925 Intel Xeon D-1649N
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 212HiSilicon Kirin 925 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 210HiSilicon Kirin 925 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
3. HiSilicon Kirin 925AMD FX-8310 HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs AMD FX-8310
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845HiSilicon Kirin 925 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710HiSilicon Kirin 925 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
6. HiSilicon Kirin 925AMD FX-4300 HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs AMD FX-4300
7. Apple A14 BionicHiSilicon Kirin 925 Apple A14 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
8. HiSilicon Kirin 925Intel Core i3-3220 HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs Intel Core i3-3220
9. HiSilicon Kirin 925Intel Core i5-9400H HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs Intel Core i5-9400H
10. Intel Core i5-4570HiSilicon Kirin 925 Intel Core i5-4570 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925


back to index