HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Intel Atom E3845

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 710A CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Atom E3845
HiSilicon Kirin 710A Intel Atom E3845

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 710A or Intel Atom E3845 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to 6 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 710A was released in Q2/2020.

The Intel Atom E3845 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.91 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom E3845 was released in Q4/2013.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family Intel Atom (108)
HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1) CPU group Intel Atom E3800 (6)
5 Generation 4
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Bay Trail
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 710A is 2.00 GHz while the Intel Atom E3845 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Atom E3845 is at 1.91 GHz.

HiSilicon Kirin 710A Characteristic Intel Atom E3845
8 Cores 4
8 Threads 4
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
A-Core 1.91 GHz
1.60 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

HiSilicon Kirin 710A Characteristic Intel Atom E3845
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A or Intel Atom E3845 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

ARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
0.65 GHz GPU frequency 0.54 GHz
1.00 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.79 GHz
Bifrost 1 GPU Generation 7
12 nm Technology 22 nm
2 Max. displays 2
8 Compute units 4
128 Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
11 DirectX Version 11.2

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A can use up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Atom E3845 supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 21.3 GB/s.

HiSilicon Kirin 710A Characteristic Intel Atom E3845
LPDDR4, LPDDR3 Memory DDR3L-1333
6 GB Max. Memory 8 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 710A is 5 W, while the Intel Atom E3845 has a TDP of 10 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

HiSilicon Kirin 710A Characteristic Intel Atom E3845
5 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 10 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A is manufactured in 14 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The Intel Atom E3845 is manufactured in 22 nm and has a 2.00 MB cache.

HiSilicon Kirin 710A Characteristic Intel Atom E3845
14 nm Technology 22 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-- Socket BGA 1170
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems
Q2/2020 Release date Q4/2013
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 710A to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Atom E3845 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 710A (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 (57%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 710A (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 (46%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
302 (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3845
4C 4T @ 1.91 GHz
198 (66%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
1338 (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3845
4C 4T @ 1.91 GHz
696 (52%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
323 (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3845
4C 4T @ 1.91 GHz
151 (47%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
1147 (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3845
4C 4T @ 1.91 GHz
455 (40%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A HiSilicon Kirin 710A
ARM Mali-G51 MP4 @ 1.00 GHz
166 (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3845
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz
51 (30%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
181025 (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3845
4C 4T @ 1.91 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
164187 (100%)
Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3845
4C 4T @ 1.91 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 710A HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3845
4C 4T @ 1.91 GHz
1058 (100%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 710A Intel Atom E3845
Honor 10X Lite Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Atom E3845Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Atom E3845 vs Intel Celeron J1900
2. Intel Atom E3827Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Atom E3845
3. Intel Atom E3815Intel Atom E3845 Intel Atom E3815 vs Intel Atom E3845
4. Intel Pentium N4200Intel Atom E3845 Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Atom E3845
5. Intel Celeron 1007UIntel Atom E3845 Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Atom E3845
6. Intel Atom E3845Intel Atom C2350 Intel Atom E3845 vs Intel Atom C2350
7. Intel Atom E3845AMD E2-3200 Intel Atom E3845 vs AMD E2-3200
8. Intel Atom E3845Intel Atom x7-E3950 Intel Atom E3845 vs Intel Atom x7-E3950
9. Intel Atom E3845Intel Celeron N3160 Intel Atom E3845 vs Intel Celeron N3160
10. Intel Atom E3845AMD E2-3000 Intel Atom E3845 vs AMD E2-3000


back to index