HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Celeron 807

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 658 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron 807
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Intel Celeron 807

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 658 or Intel Celeron 807 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 was released in Q2/2016.

The Intel Celeron 807 has 1 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 807 was released in Q2/2012.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family Intel Celeron (165)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) CPU group Intel Celeron 800 (2)
4 Generation 2
Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Sandy Bridge U
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.35 GHz. The Intel Celeron 807 has 1 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.50 GHz.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron 807
8 Cores 1
8 Threads 2
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.35 GHz
4x Cortex-A53		 A-Core 1.50 GHz
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53		 B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron 807
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
0.90 GHz GPU frequency 0.35 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.95 GHz
Midgard 4 GPU Generation 6
28nm Technology 32 nm
2 Max. displays 2
2 Compute units 6
32 Shader 48
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
11 DirectX Version 10.1

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 807 can connect up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron 807
LPDDR3-933 Memory DDR3-1333
Max. Memory 16 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 1.50 MB
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes 16
-- PCIe Bandwidth 8.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Celeron 807 is 17 W.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron 807
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 17 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Celeron 807 cache has a total of 1.50 MB.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron 807
16 nm Technology 32 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-- Socket BGA 1023
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2016 Release date Q2/2012
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 658 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 807 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 658 (61%)
Intel Celeron 807 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 658 (100%)
Intel Celeron 807 (44%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
183 (61%)
Intel Celeron 807 Intel Celeron 807
1C 2T @ 1.50 GHz
301 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
815 (100%)
Intel Celeron 807 Intel Celeron 807
1C 2T @ 1.50 GHz
360 (44%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz
61 (67%)
Intel Celeron 807 Intel Celeron 807
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1) @ 0.95 GHz
91 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 807 Intel Celeron 807
1C 2T @ 1.50 GHz
388 (100%)

Devices using this processor
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Intel Celeron 807
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. HiSilicon Kirin 658Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
2. HiSilicon Kirin 658HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
3. HiSilicon Kirin 658AMD Ryzen 5 3600 HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
4. HiSilicon Kirin 658Apple A8 HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Apple A8
5. HiSilicon Kirin 658Apple A14 Bionic HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Apple A14 Bionic
6. HiSilicon Kirin 658Intel Core i7-3635QM HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Core i7-3635QM
7. HiSilicon Kirin 658Intel Core i5-4330M HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Core i5-4330M
8. Samsung Exynos 4415HiSilicon Kirin 658 Samsung Exynos 4415 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
9. HiSilicon Kirin 658Samsung Exynos 3110 HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Samsung Exynos 3110
10. HiSilicon Kirin 658Intel Core i3-2330E HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Core i3-2330E


back to index